Conversation turned, as it does with us, to looks. She asked me if I felt beautiful--conventionally beautiful. I said certainly not. I told her about being at a concert some years ago and seeing a woman in the choir who looked very much like me--everyone in my party noticed it. She wasn't beautiful, but somehow seeing a face rather like mine on someone else helped me make my peace with my own. If that's (sort of) what I look like, I can live with it.
What I didn't get out, though, is how my response to beauty has been changed by my children. I love to look at their faces so much that I lose all context, all possibility of reference to external standards. Are they beautiful children? I really haven't any idea. All I know is that I can look at them--their round, tender cheeks, the whorls of their hair, their skinny shoulders and outrageously Greco-Roman buttocks (which, let's be clear, I see a lot of)--with the avidity with which I used to read fashion magazines or watch exquisite French movies. Their eyebrows--each boy's so different! so eloquent!--tell stories to me as good as Trollope's and Austen's.
Part of it, I guess, is pure vanity. I like what my children look like so much I can't help but warm up to me, to whom they bear some resemblance. But it's mostly not that, I think. I remember the breath almost being knocked out of me, just after Eleanor was born, when I realized that every single person I saw on the street or at the store or anywhere had been born, too--had arrived as extraordinary a visitation. I felt it was at least possible to love almost anyone, just because I loved Eleanor. And now when I look at other people, I am much more likely to see how beautiful they are, because I love so much to look at Henry and James.
| Group portrait, with dog ears. |
No comments:
Post a Comment